social networks

Gnucitizen established a new community project called House of Hackers. The purpose is to create an area where 

"...support the hacker culture, mindset, way of life, ideologies, political views, vision, etc."

If you are into hacking, and interested in keeping with the community, I suggest you pop over and take a look.

Dear anonymous (I would much rather prefer to say Dear John),

First - I post this as a blogpost instead of a reply to your comment on my post about Jamparii. 

Thank you for your input. As I know you are not only claiming to do what you say, but actually are trying to build your own tool for business networking, I would much rather that you did enter your own name, John.

However, what you are pointing at is true in all new ventures. It does take capital to build success. And there are several different paths to choose from. Jim has chosen one path, and John, you took another path.

My experience tells me that the path of money alone is not enough. To build a successful networking site, you need quality. You need content. You need active users. And you need a value proposition to your users.

Linkedin, Xing and Facebook are three successful networking tools, but they are very different. Ecademy and Viadeo are others. Myspace and Orcut are there too. Just to name a few of your competitors. They offer value. Distinctive value. And they have success. 

You need to present a clear value to me before I will even consider your new tool. No matter how you choose to finance you venture. Scam or not.

This is about risk as well. Do you have what it takes to break the bank? Did you consider all options? Have you done your homework, so you know how to position yourself?

What if you fail? What if it takes twice the time to break even? Or three times the time? What if you only secure half the funds you need? What if only one tenth of the required users actually signs up? 

So the question to you two competitors - do you have the BUZZ?

I get many strange invitations in my email. Todays selection is from a that calls themselves Biztime Limited, based in the UK. They have a new Social Networking idea - called Jamparii. Sure we can use that (pun). Their plan is to let me make a profit as they become the next MySpace and Youtube. In other words, they want my money.

The invitation came by an Ecademy group. I quit Ecademy 18 month ago because back then I felt many users where only interested in MLM and promoting scams. Even though I have canceled my account, and no longer are available on Ecademy, they continue to send me emails from their forums. That is another post, I guess!

So back to Jamparii - they ask me to give them £1 000,- in exchange for a Founder Life Membership. And a potential revenue share:

Our strategy is to create a small group of just 250 Founder Life Members, who will be the centre pillars of Jamparii and will benefit both as life members but also financially as shareholders. We already have a number in place but there are still plenty of places left. Your investment will be under £1,000 and you will have the opportunity to earn and win more shares during the first year or so.

So - I will win more shares during the first year or so. Sounds like the MLM game that took Europe by storm a few years back - you played around with virtual stocks, and made a profit based upon how many people you recruited. World Game Inc. it was called, before it was called a bluff.  

Further fuel to my presumption is the fact that 3 750 Founder members are also invited. So - we have Founder Life members who will win shares, and Founder members who pay to enter. Then add regular, paying members - they will provide the profit up the lane. Or so it may sound.

They start their story like this:

When we hear of the huge sums of money that are being paid for these web platforms do you wish that you had thought them up or had a stake in them?

Well here is an opportunity for you to do just that! - Read on and see for yourself!

I am sorry. If I had such an idea, last thing I would do is to tell everyone. I would have people use it. Not try to sell it like a scam.

Thus, I suggest Jamparii is a scam, and time will show who is right. I will have to appologize if they actually end up like MySpace or Youtube - walking away with a huge lump of money.

"I don't care if they see boobies!"

Those where the words of consultant Jennifer Jabbusch, a US-based security consultant. A successful one, I might add. Her specialty is to teach users how to relate to internet threats. Her users are teachers and other relevant personal at schools.

Her success made her write up a white paper on content filtering in schools. When she first told me, I have to admit I expected another technical oriented moch-up that seems to make every non-technical person turn away. So I kind of looked it up just to be able to tell her "I have seen it".

Of course the introduction grabbed my attention. And I kept on reading, realizing Jennifer is spot on, in a language every teacher should understand. And as she relates threats and risk to her self, it is easy for the reader to understand too.

If you are looking for a good explanation about why content filtering is a good idea for schools - and home, I might add, this white paper is all you need.

I have been known to rant about peoples lack of care or understanding when it comes to publishing information on the Internet. Most people are either incredibly naive, plain stupid or just do not care. (I do realize they probably just do not want to know).

This Youtube came to my RSS reader today (thanks Gnucitizen).

So as a reminder to my readers, please take a look at this video. It is your identity at stake. Your future.

Social networks has taken over much of the communication and networking these days. By setting up one (or many) profiles on LinkedIn, Facebook, Xing, MySpace or any other tool out there, you get to share ideas, thoughts and images with your peers, friends and the public.

Somehow, a large number of people seems to forget the last word - public. Somehow, they expect to be protected against cut'n'past of questions, comments, images and profiles. Even though they put the information into these tools themselves.

Over at LinkedIn, there has been several discussions about privacy - or what people think is privacy. Ray van den Bel, a top-linkedIn and online strategist, has a problem with LinkedIn sending his public questions to his connections. Somehow Ray is confusing privacy with public information. He posted a question (several in fact) on the Answer section of LinkedIn - a public service. Then he starts complaining when LinkedIn sends his question to other LinkedIn users. Wake up Ray, there is two reasons to post questions on LinkedIn (and similar services) - to get answers from as many as possible, and to promote yourself.

 There are other discussions on the LinkedIn Answer covering the same thing - for example someone worrying about someone copying their answer and republish it somewhere else - on blogs, Digg etc. I mean, WAKE UP! You post your ideas, thoughts, answers ONLINE! And on a public website. Hey - you have NO control over that information. If you do not like that, then keep your comments to yourself. Or pick up the phone. 

Internet is transparent. It will become more transparent. You are responsible for your own actions, and need to be in charge. 

For your information - every answer you put on LinkedIn is publicly available. If you post someting on Xing, it is even indexed by search engines. Using CoComment? It is open for the public to subscribe to YOUR comments!

In this cyberworld, you need to recognize that everything is public. If you do not like it, do not use it. It may not be entirely like the toilet wall?

Discuss your view below! 

Identity theft has been on the news for a while. TJX, CitiBank and many others have been exploited in the past. Facebook, LinkedIn and Myspace all adds to the information available. Combining the sources of information on search engines like Zoominfo and Naymz makes it so much easier to make a complete profile on just about anyone – and use that information in social engineering.