Interim Market Report - July 2010

Barclay Simpson Market Report 2010 Midway through 2010 the recovery in the corporate governance recruitment market that was evident at the start of the year is now firmly established. As recruitment consultants we have been genuinely surprised at the strength of the recovery. The recovery is focused on the financial sector and is a result of both renewed growth in the sector and greater regulatory oversight. Investment in corporate governance has clearly become a priority.

 

 

homeland security

Dodging virtural snowballs on Facebook

I use Facebook. Primarily to promote my blogs and myself (shameless, yes, I am...). And of course I enjoy being a bit of a critic too.

Especially when it comes to the huge amount of Facebook apps, I am worried. Not about the applications themselves, but by the way people uses them without any criticism and understanding of how they give away information about themselves and their network.



Of course it is fun that friends decides to throw virtual snowballs at you, vote you the most hansom in their network, want to add your birthday to their calendar and so forth. And what is even nicer is that the fact that your friends does this to you means that you have a certain popularity. And being popular is always nice, and as result, you will lower your guard. And by lowering your guards, you become an easy target - not a target of those friends trying to hit you with a snowball, but a target of those creating applications only to harvest information about
  • you, your networks,
  • your whereabouts,
  • interests,
  • religion,
  • political views,
  • who you know,
  • who you communicate with most,
  • how you communicate,
  • what you say
  • to whom you say it
  • and so forth...

Sometimes I tell my contacts that I block most applications on Facebook. Other times I do not. I just click the "Block this application". And yes, I accept that by doing so, I risk to be received as a boring old man. And I am, when it comes to my privacy. As long as I do not know who is getting my information, how they use it, for how long they will keep it and whether or not I can trust them, I keep the information to my self.

And when it comes to the applications on Facebook, they may have been developed by a fanatic hacker who is out to cash in on selling your information to the highest bidder. They may also be developed by the order of a foreign (or allied) state, harvesting intelligence about their own people, or people in a target state.

Most of us have read the 1984 by George Orwell. And most of us have some idea of what was going on during the cold war (and most other wars) - governments collected information about everyone, because everyone could be a terrorist, could be working for the enemy, could have ideas and views opposing the "accepted values".

And this still goes on in the war on terrorists - it is extremely easy to show up on the "radar", but to clear your name may turn out to be very hard - as opposed to the publicly accepted principles of justice, when it comes to war, you no longer need to be proven guilty. It is more than enough to be suspected.

Using the Internet to gather this type of information is so easy that former surveillance officers are wetting their pants. And the ease which they are lullying all of us into the safety of surveillance is alarming. Hiding surveillance as nice-to-have tools - like video surveillance to stop thiefes lifting your pocket on the street (who believes that the camera really stops someone picking you pocket anyway???), GPS devices on phones to help you find your way (giving away your exact position and target to Google and who know how many others...), fraud detection systems in the banks (following your every movement and the shops you visit - in real time).

The list goes on forever. And we accept it. It is so easy to accept. It has become a habit. Something we just do. Just like when Facebook shows us their privacy policy and user agreements. No need to read it through, just click "I accept this" - whatever it says. And that is what most of us do. Just accept it.

We choose to trust this application with our most personal information - including pictures from parties, our current moods, our social life, interests. You name it, and you will find it.



I do not enjoy virtual snowballs. I prefer the real thing. Then you know what hits you. And when. You can wipe your neck, and move on. With the virtual snowballs you have no control, and you have no idea what will hit you and when. All you know is that having fun with your friends comes with a price, and that price is sharing your privacy information. To someone else but your friend. Someone is using your friend to trick you to give away valuable information that may make of break your future.

I have nothing against snowball wars amongst friends. I'll take your challenge any day. As long as we use real snow!

On a side note - enjoy this lovestory!


Freedom of press - or censorship in practice

Larko pointed me to this global rating about freedom of press. It seems I live in a country where we have the de facto standard. Which is nice of course. But turning attention to the other end of the list is not fun reading.

List includes:

  • Norway & Iceland - 1. place, with 0,75 points
Which probably means that as long as I stay here, I can keep up writing whatever I feel like. Darn, there go my international career!
  • USA at place 48. with 14.5 points

A large amount of my readers are located there, as are many bloggers. I bet you guys will work to raise the US on the list. Particular events like these:

"There were slightly fewer press freedom violations in the United States (48th) and blogger Josh Wolf was freed after 224 days in prison. But the detention of Al-Jazeera’s Sudanese cameraman, Sami Al-Haj, since 13 June 2002 at the military base of Guantanamo and the murder of Chauncey Bailey in Oakland in August mean the United States is still unable to join the lead group."

will hopefully put your focus on working against censorship.

 

  • It seems there are more freedom of press in Europe & Australia than anywhere else in the world
"Outside Europe - in which the top 14 countries are located - no region of the world has been spared censorship or violence towards journalists."
  • China & Burma is almost at the bottom of the list, together with Iran, Eritrea and North Korea(No surprise there)
"We also regret that China (163rd) stagnates near the bottom of the index. With less than a year to go to the 2008 Beijing Olympics, the reforms and the releases of imprisoned journalists so often promised by the authorities seem to be a vain hope.”
 
So do I. Hopefully, the Olympics may start a new trend, where China and Asia works toward human rights and freedom of press.
  • Bloggers are not safe!
“We are concerned about the increase in cases of online censorship,” Reporters Without Borders said. “More and more governments have realised that the Internet can play a key role in the fight for democracy and they are establishing new methods of censoring it. The governments of repressive countries are now targeting bloggers and online journalists as forcefully as journalists in the traditional media.”
 
Online communities and blogging has become an increasingly important communication channel. Many blogs are inaccessible from China. And as blogging gain popularity, bloggers get the attention of censoring governments and presidents.
 
A company have the right to control the information that they distribute. It is called branding, PR, marketing and damage control. We accept this right, as well as the company's right to fire or remove the person who communicate publicly without the consent of the company.
 
Should not a country have the same right? Why should a company be able to fully control its public picture, and a country not? Or do we need to review the companies rights to do whatever they seem necessary to reach their targets? Are there limits to what a company should be allowed to do? And how do we treat the whistle blowers?
 
What are your thoughts? Is censorship ok?
 
UPDATE: Dave Lewis has an interesting post about Yahoo and imprisonment of a Chinese journalist!

Weekend Laugh - the Homeland security toolkit

This weekend, you get to laugh about homeland security. The strip seems to be authored back in 2002, but IMO, it is only getting more relevant. 

Add to this the NY Times story that in interrogating terrorists, you can use violence - physical and psychological. I know most of us is way too young to remember WWII, but hey, we have all read about it, right? Do we EVER learn? 

It is a sad laugh this weekend - I'd much rather cry. 

$250M security just for show?

I am amazed at how crazy one can be just to have your face on the TV screen. Comedians stop for nothing, it seems. Even the risk of getting shot by snipers - who mean business - according to Police Commissioner Andrew Scipione:

"I'm angry, I'm very angry that this stunt happened, it was a very dangerous stunt. The reality is ... (they) put security services in a position where they might have had to take an action no-one would want. We have snipers deployed around the city. They weren't there for show, they mean business, that's what they were there for." it was reported in the Daily Telegraph.

I suspect he is more angry about the fact that his show was called as what is was - nothing but a showoff. A fraud. A $250M comedy, one may say.

It sure raises the question - if a motorcade is not even checked and verified upon before it reaches the final destination, one should be very happy that it was a comedian dressed up like Osama Bin Laden that stepped out of the car - and not his suicidal crews.

Poor Andrew Scipione. I suspect you will not be running such a show again any time soon.

Take a look at the fake IDs, the Osama Bin Laden and the full story over at UK Indymedia!

And make sure to read Bruce Schneiers comments!!

Weekend Laugh - airport security

It is friday. Time for a laugh. I picked this YouTube up on Mitchell Ashley's blog.

Ever wondered about the new airport security? Wonder no more. The Homeland dep. have more questions than answers, and they only employ the cream-de-la-cream as their security staff. As I've said before, the airport security only serves as a security show-off, and I believe it actually makes it less safe to travel as everyone - and I mean everyone - gets annoyed and angry.

Time for your weekend laugh. Now you know why there are long lines at the airport!

 

 

YouTube link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ykzqFz_nHZE

Syndicate content

Recent comments