Do we really need AntiVirus solutions in 2008?

Nice work by the blogger....... Thanks a lot for the wonderful share

I don't know what to say about that, i guess it depends on the pages you visit or how you use your computer. If you rarely use the internet i don't see the point to pay for an anti-virus either, but if you surf the internet on a daily basis then it's better to be prepared for what's worse. There are still plenty viruses out there waiting to infect your computer, you should at least have an anti virus free download, but never give up on protection.

Thats is a good analogy. Just because we think we are safe doesn't mean the threat has gone away. What we need to do is keep beefing up the AV so that it will catch more of the things that we are dealing with today.

AV is still needed more than ever but let's face it, there are plenty of free solutions out there so why not? It's not costing us anything. I was reading the avast antivirus review and when you look at the differences in the free and paid versions there really isn't that much.

it there are still lots of older things floating around the internet that it catches. I'm afraid that w/o it we would be in much worse shape overall than we currently are.

@Kurt: Thank you for commenting! I removed the second of your comments, as you said yourself - it was a double. I hope you do not mind. @Andy: Thanks :) And good to have you back too! Keep it up, buddy! @Larko: lol

sorry for the double post - my browser stalled...

"Have the virus authors started to write smaller virus that stays below the radar - and thus are not detected by the AV-products?" many of the virus authors of old have simply grown up and found more fulfilling things to do with their lives... "Are they now only targeting special targets - like particular banks, SCADA or singled out corporations? Or countries and causes? Or are they too busy writing malware to care about virus? " viruses are malware... non-viral malware, however, seems to be what the cyber-crooks prefer these days... self-replication has a way of getting out of hand and calling attention to the malware... "Do we really need to pay out on gateway and client AV solutions if there are no virus knocking on the door? " who says there isn't? just because you aren't hearing about new epidemics doesn't mean new viruses aren't getting written or even that the old ones have stopped... some of the most prevalent email-born malware are mass-mailing worms that are already a few years old (like netsky.p)... "Do you believe that there are no more virus out there?" absolutely not... some people are still getting infected by decades-old boot infectors... "That other threats are taking over and rendering AV-solutions useless?" other threats are just as detectable with av as viruses are... "Is this the whole truth? Or have the AV solutions became so good that they catch everything, even without us noticing? That they are an absolute critical part of the solution for any entity connected to the net?" let's put it this way - old viruses never die, their populations just shrink to a size too small to accurately report/track... av is one of the things that helps keep those populations small... and when it comes to newer non-viral malware, av is what helps keep it's usability limited... without the blacklist, the bad guys would just find something that successfully bypassed other defenses and keep using it over and over because other defenses cannot be updated as fast as a blacklist...

Kai, It's good to see you blogging more. My take on this is that it is still needed. While it is not nearly as effective as it should be and the bad guys are getting under the radar of it there are still lots of older things floating around the internet that it catches. I'm afraid that w/o it we would be in much worse shape overall than we currently are.

Would you have sex with a stranger without a condom if the media reported that you are less likely to catch AIDS than you used to?